Matthew Kandrach, Contributing Writer//February 3, 2021
Matthew Kandrach, Contributing Writer//February 3, 2021//
Democratic majorities in the U.S. House and Senate, along with a new Biden administration, promise sweeping policy changes in the United States. This includes campaign pledges to remake America’s electricity mix. But with campaign season over, Democrats should put rhetoric aside and pursue a bipartisan energy plan that supports economic recovery.
During the 2020 campaign, President Biden pledged to “achieve a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035.” Doing so would mean essentially — in a mere 14 years — eliminating all of the fossil-fuel power plants currently supplying 63% of America’s electricity needs. It’s just this type of plan that could prove crippling to the U.S. economy — eliminating millions of jobs and driving up energy prices while offering only vague promises on replacing longstanding power generation or managing additional costs.
Both the U.S. and Europe already have some experience with this kind of aggressive transition away from traditional fuels toward more renewable power. And the results are troubling.
For example, California’s shift to a renewable-heavy grid has already yielded some of the nation’s highest electricity prices and serious grid reliability issues. During a heat wave last summer, California suffered rolling blackouts when demand outstripped the state’s available power supply.
Texas has experienced a similar shock, now that its power mix increasingly relies on wind generation. The state’s pivot away from traditional base-load power toward weather-dependent electricity has led to worrying shortfalls — including a 2019 summer heat wave when insufficient wind conditions caused electricity prices to spike.
New England has seen price increases, too. Rapidly transitioning away from a balanced electricity mix that once included coal has meant dire fuel security warnings from the region’s grid operator along with electricity prices now running almost twice the national average.
The same problems are cropping up overseas. Germany’s “energiewende” movement toward full-scale wind and solar power has driven German electricity prices to three times the U.S. average.
Japan is also seeing record electricity prices as grid operators warn that available power isn’t keeping up with demand. And even the UK power grid is showing signs of strain. Britain’s grid manager has already issued four warnings this winter, with power demand on the verge of exceeding supply. It’s an alarmingly common occurrence now that the nation has shifted to greater reliance on intermittent wind generation.
The Biden administration is taking office at a time of serious economic disruption from the Covid pandemic. The new president may be eager to roll out a comprehensive energy agenda, but the American people can ill-afford the hefty additional costs right now.
Families depend on reliable, affordable electricity. Yes, there’s great appeal to incorporating more solar and wind power in the nation’s electric grid. But the priority must be to ensure secure, affordable power for 330 million people. It would be a grave mistake to hurriedly abandon the nation’s current, diverse electricity mix in favor of costly power generation that could prove insufficient when it’s needed most.
Matthew Kandrach is president of Consumer Action for a Strong Economy, a free-market advocacy organization.